贝壳电子书 > 英文原著电子书 > lucasta >

第4章

lucasta-第4章

小说: lucasta 字数: 每页4000字

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!




〃'He' answered; 'On Wednesday last was sevennight; he came from Yorke; and came to his house in London。

〃'He heard of a petition that was never delivered。

〃'He never heard of any censure of the Parliament。

〃'He heard that a paper was burnt for being irregularly burnt '?presented'。

〃'He had heard that the Petition; that went under the name of the Kentish Petition; was burnt by the hands of the common hangman。

〃'He never heard of any order of either; 'or' of both; the Houses concerning 'the Petition'。

〃'He was at Hull on Thursday or Friday was a sevennight: as he came from Yorke; he took Hull in the way。  He had heard; that Sir Roger Twisden was questioned for the like Petition。

〃'He was yesterday at BLACKHEATH。'

〃Resolved; upon the question; that Captain Lovelace shall be presently Committed prisoner to the Gatehouse。

〃Resolved; upon the question; that Sir William Boteler shall be presently committed prisoner to the Fleet。

〃Ordered; that the sergeant shall apprehend them; and carry them in safe custody; and deliver them as prisoners to the several prisons aforesaid。〃

On the 4th May; 1642; the House of Commons ordered Mr。 Whittlock and others to prepare a charge against Mr。 Lovelace and Sir William Boteler with all expedition; but nothing further is heard of the matter till the 17th June; When Lovelace and Boteler petitioned the House separately for their release from custody。 Hereupon Sir William was discharged on finding personal bail to the extent of 10;000; with a surety for 5000; and in the case of his companion in misfortune it was ordered; on the question; that 〃he be forthwith bailed upon GOOD security。〃  This 〃good security;〃 surely; did not reach the sum mentioned by Wood; namely; 40;000; but it is likely that the author of the ATHENAE is ONLY wrong by a cypher; and that the amount fixed was 4000; as it has been already suggested。  Thus Lovelace's confinement did not exceed seven weeks in duration; and the probability; is that the sole inconvenience; which he subsequently experienced; was the loss of the bail。

The description left by Wood and Aubrey of the end of Lovelace can only be reconciled with the fact; that his daughter and heiress conveyed Kingsdown; Hever; and a moiety of Chipsted; to the Cokes by marriage with Mr。 Henry Coke; by presuming that those manors were entailed; while Lovelace Place; as well perhaps as Bayford and Goodneston; not being similarly secured; were sold to defray the owner's incumbrances。  At any rate it is not; upon the whole; very probable that he died in a hovel; in a state of absolute poverty; that he received a pound a week (equal to about 4 of our money) from two friends; Cotton and another; Aubrey himself admits; and we may rest satisfied that; however painful the contrast may have been between the opening and close of that career; the deplorable account given in the ATHENAE; and in the so…called LIVES OF EMINENT MEN; is much exaggerated and overdrawn。

It has not hitherto been remarked; that among the Kentish gentry who; from time to time; elected to change the nature of their tenure from gavelkind to primogeniture; were the Lovelaces themselves; in the person of Thomas Lovelace; who; by Act of Parliament 2 and 3 Edw。 VI。 obtained; concurrently with several other families; the power of conversion。  This Thomas Lovelace was not improbably the same; who was admitted a student of Gray's Inn in 1541; and that he was of the Kentish Lovelaces there is not much reason to doubt; although; at the same time; I am unable to fix the precise degree of consanguinity between him and Serjeant William Lovelace of Gray's Inn; who died in 1576; and who was great… grandfather to the author of LUCASTA。  The circumstance that the real property of Thomas Lovelace aforesaid; situated in Kent; was released by Act of Parliament; 2 and 3 Edw。 VI。 from the operations of gavelkind tenure (assuming; as is most likely to have been the case; that he was of the same stock as the poet; though not an immediate ancestor;) seems to explain the following allusion by Dudley Lovelace in the verses prefixed by him to LUCASTA; 1649:

    〃Those by the landed have been writ;      Mine's but a younger…brother wit。〃

As well as the subjoined lines by Lovelace in the poem entitled; 〃To Lucasta; from Prison;〃 (see p。 44 of present edition):

    〃Next would I court my LIBERTY;      And then my birthright; PROPERTY。〃

There is evidence to prove that Lovelace was on intimate terms with some of the wits of his time; and that he had friendly relations with many of themsuch as Hall; Rawlins; Lenton; and particularly the Cottons。  John Tatham; the City Poet; and author of THE FANCIES THEATER; 1640; knew him well; and addressed to him some stanzas; not devoid of merit; during his stay abroad。 In 1643; Henry Glapthorne; a celebrated dramatist and poet of the same age; dedicated to Lovelace his poem of WHITEHALL; printed in that year in a quarto pamphlet; with elegies on the Earls of Bedford and Manchester。  The pages of LUCASTA bear testimony to the acquaintance of the author with Anthony Hodges of New College; Oxford; translator of CLITOPHON AND LEUCIPPE from the Greek of Achilles Tatius (or rather probably from a Latin version of the original); and with other members of the University。

Although it is stated by Wood that LUCASTA was prepared for the press by Lovelace himself; on his return from the Continent in 1648; it is impossible to believe that any care was bestowed on the correction of the text; or on the arrangement of the various pieces which compose the volume: nor did his brother Dudley Posthumus; who edited the second part of the book in 1659; perform his task in any degree better。  In both instances; the printer seems to have been suffered to do the work in his own way; and very infamously he has done it。  To supply all the short…comings of the author and his literary executor at this distance of time; is; unfortunately; out of the power of any editor; but in the present republication I have taken the liberty of rearranging the poems; to a certain extent in the order in which it may be conjectured that they were written; and where Lovelace contributed commendatory verses to other works; either before or after the appearance of the first portion of LUCASTA; the two texts have been collated; and improved readings been occasionally obtained。

The few poems; on which the fame of Lovelace may be said to rest; are emanations not only of the stirring period in which he lived; but of the peculiar circumstances into which he was thrown at different epochs of his life。  Lovelace had not the melodious and exquisite taste of Herrick; the wit of Suckling; or the power of Randolph (so often second only to his master Jonson)。 Mr。 Singer has praised the exuberant fancy of Lovelace; but; in my thinking; Lovelace was inferior in fancy; as well as in grace; both to Carew and the author of HESPERIDES。  Yet Lovelace has left behind him one or two things; which I doubt if any of those writers could have produced; and which our greatest poets would not have been ashamed to own。  Winstanley was so far right in instituting a comparison between Lovelace and Sydney; that it is hard to name any one in the entire circle of early English literature except Sydney and Wither; who could have attempted; with any chance of success; the SONG TO ALTHEA FROM PRISON; and how differently Sydney at least would have handled it!  We know what Herrick would have made of it; it would have furnished the theme for one more invocation to Julia。  From Suckling we should have had a bantering playfulness; or a fescennine gaiety; equally unsuited to the subject。  Waller had once an opportunity of realizing the position; which has been described by his contemporary in immortal stanzas; but Waller; when he was under confinement; was thinking too much of his neck to write verses with much felicity; and preferred waiting; till he got back to Beaconsfield (when his inspiration had evaporated); to pour out his feelings to Lady Dorothy or Lady Sophia。  Wither's song; 〃Shall I wasting in Despair;〃 is certainly superior to the SONG TO ALTHEA。  Wither was fre

返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0

你可能喜欢的