唄診窮徨慕 > 哂猟圻广窮徨慕 > the moravians in georgia(暢袋略寓壓杷嵶冉) >

及52嫗

the moravians in georgia(暢袋略寓壓杷嵶冉)-及52嫗

弌傍�� the moravians in georgia(暢袋略寓壓杷嵶冉) 忖方�� 耽匈4000忖

梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��




garden�察�rent   free。The title to the   farm lots   was in   jeopardy�察�for   a   certain 

Alderman   Becker   in   London   claimed   that   the   Trustees   had   given   him   a 

tract�察�including these and many other farms�察�but the settlers thereon were 

making   a   strong   fight   to   hold   their  property�察  �in   which   they   were   finally 



                                                 155 


´ Page 156´

                                   The Moravians in Georgia 



successful。 

     At the time of Frederick William Marshall's visit to Savannah in 1775�察�

the two farm  lots were reported to have   some good timber�察 �even if   they 

were not of much use otherwise�察�and the town lots had increased in value 

with   the   growth   of   the   town。   Marshall   thought   the   latter   could   again   be 

used   for   residence�察  �and   as   a   centre   for   such   missionary   work   as   was 

already   begun   by   Mueller�察  �Wagner   and   Broesing�察  �but   the   Revolutionary 

War put an end to their efforts。 

     At   this   point   in   the   records   appears   a   peculiar   uncertainty   as   to   the 

identity   of   the   owner   of   the   David   Nitschmann   lots。   The   fact   that   there 

were     three   David    Nitschmanns        in  the   active   service    of  the  Moravian 

Church   during   a   number   of   years   after   its   renewal   in   Herrnhut   affords 

ample opportunity for confusion�察�but one would not expect to find it in the 

minds of their contemporaries。But even such a man as Frederick William 

Marshall wrote�察 �The Deeds to these two lots�察�Nos。 3 and 4�察�are kept in 

Bethlehem ��one stands in the name of Brother Joseph�察�the other of Bishop 

D'd Nitschmann�察�who passed away in Bethlehem�� and it would be well if 

something   were   done   about   them。   I   do   not   know   what   can   be   arranged 

with the son of the latter�察�but Brother David Nitschmann�察�who is now in 

Zeist�察   �said   when     he  was    in  America      that   he  himself     was   the   David 

Nitschmann in whose name the grant was made�察�because he was the one 

who had shared in the negotiations with the Trustees of Georgia。;Bishop 

David Nitschmann had died in Bethlehem�察�Oct。 9th�察�1772�察�where his son 

Immanuel lived until 1790。 The David Nitschmann residing in Zeist was 

the   Syndic�察  �formerly   Count   Zinzendorf's   Hausmeister�察  �the   leader   of   the 

first company to London�察�where he and Spangenberg had arranged matters 

with   the   Trustees�察  �and   had   each   received   fifty   acres   of   land   in   his   own 

name。 The   Bishop   had had   nothing   whatever to   do   with   the   matter�察  �and 

this was the conclusion reached�察�for the title to the Town Lot No。 3 passed 

at   the   Syndic's    death�察   �March     28th�察  �1779�察   �to  his   son   Christian    David 

Nitschmann。 

     June   14th�察  �1784�察  �August   Gottlieb   Spangenberg   and   Christian   David 

Nitschmann   by   deed   transferred   their   title   to   the   Savannah   property   to 

Hans Christian Alexander von Schweinitz�察�Administrator of the estate of 



                                                 156 


´ Page 157´

                                  The Moravians in Georgia 



the Unitas Fratrum in Pennsylvania。 

     The    Revolutionary       War   had    come    and   gone�察  �and    Von   Schweinitz 

began     again   to   investigate    the  condition    of   affairs  in  Savannah。Their 

Agent�察�James Habersham�察�had died in 1775�察�but his son James had kept up 

the taxes�察�so the title was intact。;But there is a matter�察─�he wrote�察 �which it 

is   necessary     you   should    be  made     acquainted     with。   When     the  British 

Troops took possession of Savannah�察�they had occasion for a lot belonging 

to   a   Mr。   George   Kellar�察  �for   the   purpose   of   erecting   a   fort   on�察  �it   being 

situated in the outskirts of the town�察�and in order to satisfy this man they 

VERY GENEROUSLY gave him your two lots in lieu of the one they had 

taken from him�察�but very fortunately for you�察�our Legislature passed a Law 

rendering null and void all their acts during the time they held this country�察�

and    notwithstanding       Mr。   Kellar   is  perfectly   well   acquainted     with   this 

matter�察�he has moved a house on one of the lots�察�and on the other he has 

lately built another house�察�which he rents out�察�and holds possession  in 

defiance of me�察�as I am possessed of no power of attorney to warrant any 

proceeding against him。;A power of attorney was at once sent Habersham�察�

with instructions to evict the intruder�察�and rent�察�lease or sell the property。 

     A suit against the trespasser was won in 1794�察�but in 1801 his tenant 

was   still   in   possession�察  �poor�察  �and   refusing   to   pay   rent。   Habersham   had 

meanwhile   died�察  �and   John   Gebhard   Cunow�察  �acting   as   attorney   for   Von 

Schweinitz�察  �who   had   returned   to   Germany   in   1798�察  �requested   Matthew 

McAllister to take charge of the matter�察�but McAllister�察�having made some 

inquiries�察�reported that the man named John Robinson�察�who lived on the 

premises�察�was likely to make trouble�察�and that as he himself was the only 

Judge in   the district   it   would be   better to put  the  case into   the  hands of 

some     one   else�察  �and   leave   him   free   to  hear   it。Cunow     therefore    asked 

George Woodruff   to   act   as   attorney�察  �to   which   he   agreed�察  �requesting   that 

John Lawson be associated with him�察�which was done the following year。 

     Hans   Christian Alexander   von   Schweinitz   died   Feb。   26th�察  �1802�察  �the 

title to the Savannah Lots passing by will to Christian Lewis Benzien�察�of 

Salem�察�North Carolina�察�who however requested Cunow to continue to look 

after them。 

     The Agents had no light task in ejecting John Robinson and his wife 



                                               157 


´ Page 158´

                                   The Moravians in Georgia 



from their abode�察�for he was ;a foolish�察�drunken man�察─�and she ;a perfect 

`virago'�察  �and   the   Sheriff   is   really   afraid   of   her�察─  �but   on   July   5th�察  �1805�察�

Lawson   wrote   to   Cunow�察      �I   am   happy   to   inform   you   that   after   great 

trouble     and    difficulty   we    have    this   day   obtained     possession      of  Mr。 

Benzien's lots。; 

     Feb。 17th�察�1807�察�Christian Lewis Benzien�察�by his attorneys Woodruff 

and Lawson�察�conveyed Town Lot No。 4�察�Second Tything�察�Anson Ward�察�to 

Charles Odingsell�察�the consideration being 1��500�察�one hundred dollars in 

cash�察  �the   rest   secured   by   bond   and   mortgage�察  �payable   in   one�察  �two�察  �and 

three years�察�with 8 per cent interest from date。 

     In   the  same   manner Town   Lot   No。  3   was   sold to Worthington   Gale�察�

March 14th�察�1807�察�for 1��450。 

     Owing   to   ;the   distress   of   the   times�察─  �payment   of   these   bonds   was 

slightly delayed�察�but by June�察�1811�察�both were cancelled。 

     Although   the   two   Town   Lots   thus   brought   2��950�察  �they   had   cost   a 

good   deal   in   taxes   and   attorney's   fees�察  �and   it   is   doubtful   whether   the 

general treasury profited greatly by the investment�察�and certainly the men 

who had lived   and labored   and suffered in   Georgia were   in no   financial 

way enriched thereby。 

     Christian Lewis Benzien died Nov。 13th�察�1811�察�and the two Farm Lots 

were transferred by will to John Gebhard Cunow of Bethlehem�察�Pa。�察�who 

in March�察�1822�察�deeded them to Lewis David de Schweinitz of Bethlehem�察�

Pa。 

     And   here   the   two   Farm   Lots   disappear   from   the   records。   They   had 

never been available for farming purposes�察�and by degrees the timber was 

stolen from them�察�so that it became wiser to let them go than to keep up 

the taxes with no prospect of return。In course of time the title lapsed

卦指朕村 貧匯匈 和匯匈 指欺競何 壘��2�� 家��2��

低辛嬬浪散議