wealbk01-第48章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！



to　him；　after　paying　the　labour　and　replacing　the　stock　of　the

farmer；　together　with　its　ordinary　profits；　would　necessarily　be

much　greater。　Whatever　was　the　rate　at　which　labour　was　commonly

maintained　in　that　country；　this　greater　surplus　could　always

maintain　a　greater　quantity　of　it；　and　consequently　enable　the

landlord　to　purchase　or　command　a　greater　quantity　of　it。　The

real　value　of　his　rent；　his　real　power　and　authority；　his　command

of　the　necessaries　and　conveniencies　of　life　with　which　the

labour　of　other　people　could　supply　him；　would　necessarily　be

much　greater。

　　　　　A　rice　field　produces　a　much　greater　quantity　of　food　than

the　most　fertile　corn　field。　Two　crops　in　the　year　from　thirty　to

sixty　bushels　each；　are　said　to　be　the　ordinary　produce　of　an

acre。　Though　its　cultivation；　therefore；　requires　more　labour；　a

much　greater　surplus　remains　after　maintaining　all　that　labour。

In　those　rice　countries；　therefore；　where　rice　is　the　common　and

favourite　vegetable　food　of　the　people；　and　where　the　cultivators

are　chiefly　maintained　with　it；　a　greater　share　of　this　greater

surplus　should　belong　to　the　landlord　than　in　corn　countries。　In

Carolina；　where　the　planters；　as　in　other　British　colonies；　are

generally　both　farmers　and　landlords；　and　where　rent　consequently

is　confounded　with　profit；　the　cultivation　of　rice　is　found　to　be

more　profitable　than　that　of　corn；　though　their　fields　produce

only　one　crop　in　the　year；　and　though；　from　the　prevalence　of　the

customs　of　Europe；　rice　is　not　there　the　common　and　favourite

vegetable　food　of　the　people。

　　　　　A　good　rice　field　is　a　bog　at　all　seasons；　and　at　one　season

a　bog　covered　with　water。　It　is　unfit　either　for　corn；　or

pasture；　or　vineyard；　or；　indeed；　for　any　other　vegetable　produce

that　is　very　useful　to　men；　and　the　lands　which　are　fit　for　those

purposes　are　not　fit　for　rice。　Even　in　the　rice　countries；

therefore；　the　rent　of　rice　lands　cannot　regulate　the　rent　of　the

other　cultivated　land；　which　can　never　be　turned　to　that　produce。

　　　　　The　food　produced　by　a　field　of　potatoes　is　not　inferior　in

quantity　to　that　produced　by　a　field　of　rice；　and　much　superior

to　what　is　produced　by　a　field　of　wheat。　Twelve　thousand　weight

of　potatoes　from　an　acre　of　land　is　not　a　greater　produce　than

two　thousand　weight　of　wheat。　The　food　or　solid　nourishment；

indeed；　which　can　be　drawn　from　each　of　those　two　plants；　is　not

altogether　in　proportion　to　their　weight；　on　account　of　the

watery　nature　of　potatoes。　Allowing；　however；　half　the　weight　of

this　root　to　go　to　water；　a　very　large　allowance；　such　an　acre　of

potatoes　will　still　produce　six　thousand　weight　of　solid

nourishment；　three　times　the　quantity　produced　by　the　acre　of

wheat。　An　acre　of　potatoes　is　cultivated　with　less　expense　than

an　acre　of　wheat；　the　fallow；　which　generally　precedes　the　sowing

of　wheat；　more　than　compensating　the　hoeing　and　other

extraordinary　culture　which　is　always　given　to　potatoes。　Should

this　root　ever　become　in　any　part　of　Europe；　like　rice　in　some

rice　countries；　the　common　and　favourite　vegetable　food　of　the

people；　so　as　to　occupy　the　same　proportion　of　the　lands　in

tillage　which　wheat　and　other　sorts　of　grain　for　human　food　do　at

present；　the　same　quantity　of　cultivated　land　would　maintain　a

much　greater　number　of　people；　and　the　labourers　being　generally

fed　with　potatoes；　a　greater　surplus　would　remain　after　replacing

all　the　stock　and　maintaining　all　the　labour　employed　in

cultivation。　A　greater　share　of　this　surplus；　too；　would　belong

to　the　landlord。　Population　would　increase；　and　rents　would　rise

much　beyond　what　they　are　at　present。

　　　　　The　land　which　is　fit　for　potatoes　is　fit　for　almost　every

other　useful　vegetable。　If　they　occupied　the　same　proportion　of

cultivated　land　which　corn　does　at　present；　they　would　regulate；

in　the　same　manner；　the　rent　of　the　greater　part　of　other

cultivated　land。

　　　　　In　some　parts　of　Lancashire　it　is　pretended；　I　have　been

told；　that　bread　of　oatmeal　is　a　heartier　food　for　labouring

people　than　wheaten　bread；　and　I　have　frequently　heard　the　same

doctrine　held　in　Scotland。　I　am；　however；　somewhat　doubtful　of

the　truth　of　it。　The　common　people　in　Scotland；　who　are　fed　with

oatmeal；　are　in　general　neither　so　strong；　nor　so　handsome　as　the

same　rank　of　people　in　England　who　are　fed　with　wheaten　bread。

They　neither　work　so　well；　nor　look　so　well；　and　as　there　is　not

the　same　difference　between　the　people　of　fashion　in　the　two

countries；　experience　would　seem　to　show　that　the　food　of　the

common　people　in　Scotland　is　not　so　suitable　to　the　human

constitution　as　that　of　their　neighbours　of　the　same　rank　in

England。　But　it　seems　to　be　otherwise　with　potatoes。　The

chairmen；　porters；　and　coalheavers　in　London；　and　those

unfortunate　women　who　live　by　prostitution；　the　strongest　men　and

the　most　beautiful　women　perhaps　in　the　British　dominions；　are

said　to　be　the　greater　part　of　them　from　the　lowest　rank　of

people　in　Ireland；　who　are　generally　fed　with　this　root。　No　food

can　afford　a　more　decisive　proof　of　its　nourishing　quality；　or　of

its　being　peculiarly　suitable　to　the　health　of　the　human

constitution。

　　　　　It　is　difficult　to　preserve　potatoes　through　the　year；　and

impossible　to　store　them　like　corn；　for　two　or　three　years

together。　The　fear　of　not　being　able　to　sell　them　before　they　rot

discourages　their　cultivation；　and　is；　perhaps；　the　chief

obstacle　to　their　ever　becoming　in　any　great　country；　like　bread；

the　principal　vegetable　food　of　all　the　different　ranks　of　the

people。　　

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　PART　2

　　　　　　　　　　　Of　the　Produce　of　Land　which　sometimes　does；

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　and　sometimes　does　not；　afford　Rent　

　　　　　HUMAN　food　seems　to　be　the　only　produce　of　land　which　always

and　necessarily　affords　some　rent　to　the　landlord。　Other　sorts　of

produce　sometimes　may　and　sometimes　may　not；　according　to

different　circumstances。

　　　　　After　food；　clothing　and　lodging　are　the　two　great　wants　of

mankind。

　　　　　Land　in　its　original　rude　state　can　afford　the　materials　of

clothing　and　lodging　to　a　much　greater　number　of　people　than　it

can　feed。　In　its　improved　state　it　can　sometimes　feed　a　greater

number　of　people　than　it　can　supply　with　those　materials；　at

least　in　the　way　in　which　they　require　them；　and　are　willing　to

pay　for　them。　In　the　one　state；　therefore；　there　is　always　a

superabundance　of　those　materials；　which　are　frequently；　upon

that　account；　of　little　or　no　value。　In　the　other　there　is　often

a　scarcity；　which　necessarily　augments　their　value。　In　the　one

state　a　great　part　of　them　is　thrown　away　as　useless；　and　the

price　of　what　is　used　is　considered　as　equal　only　to　the　labour

and　expense　of　fitting　it　for　use；　and　can；　therefore；　afford　no

rent　to　the　landlord。　In　the　other　they　are　all　made　use　of；　and

there　is　frequently　a　demand　for　more　than　can　be　had。　Somebody

is　always　willing　to　give　more　for　every　part　of　them　than　what

is　sufficient　to　pay　the　expense　of　bringing　them　to　market。

Their　price；　therefore；　can　always　afford　some　rent　to　the

landlord。

　　　　　The　skins　of　the　larger　animals　were　the　original　materials

of　clothing。　Among　nations　of　hunters　and　shepherds；　therefore；

whose　food　consists　chiefly　in　the　flesh　of　those　animals；　every

man；　by　providing　himself　with　food；　provides　himself　with　the

materials　of　more　clothing　than　he　can　wear。　If　there　was　no

foreign　commerce；　the　greater　part　of　them　would　be　thrown　away

as　things　of　no　value。　This　was　probably　the　case　among　the

hunting　nations　of　North　America　before　their　country　was

discovered　by　the　Europeans；　with　whom　they　now　exchange　their

surplus　peltry　for　blankets；　fire…arms；　and　brandy；　which　gives

it　some　value。　In　the　present　commercial　state　of　the　known

world；　the　most　barbarous　nations；　I　believe；　among　whom　land

property　is　established；　have　some　foreign　commerce　of　this　kind；

and　find　among　t