a vindication of the rights of woman-第23章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
ly pleasing and attractive; yet; when the pretty freshness of youth is worn off; these artless graces become studied airs; and disgust every person of taste。 In the countenance of girls we only look for vivacity and bashful modesty; but; the springtide of life over; we look for soberer sense in the face; and for traces of passion; instead of the dimples of animal spirits; expecting to see individuality of character; the only fastener of the affections。 We then wish to converse; not to fondle; to give scope to our imaginations; as well as to the sensations of our hearts。 At twenty the beauty of both sexes is equal; but the libertinism of man leads him to make the distinction; and superannuated coquettes are commonly of the same opinion; for when they can no longer inspire love; they pay for the vigour and vivacity of youth。 The French who admit more of mind into their notions of beauty; give the preference to women of thirty。 I mean to say; that they allow women to be in their most perfect state; when vivacity gives place to reason; and to that majestic seriousness of character; which marks maturity; or; the resting point。 In youth; till twenty the body shoots out; till thirty the solids are attaining a degree of density; and the flexible muscles; growing daily more rigid; give character to the countenance; that is; they trace the operations of the mind with the iron pen of fate; and tell us not only what powers are within; but how they have been employed。 It is proper to observe; that animals who arrive slowly at maturity; are the longest lived; and of the noblest species。 Men cannot; however; claim any natural superiority from the grandeur of longevity; for in this respect nature has not distinguished the male。 Polygamy is another physical degradation; and a plausible argument for a custom; that blasts every domestic virtue; is drawn from the well…attested fact; that in the countries where it is established; more females are born than males。 This appears to be an indication of nature; and to nature apparently reasonable speculations must yield。 A further conclusion obviously presents itself; if polygamy be necessary; woman must be inferior to man; and made for him。 With respect to the formation of the foetus in the womb; we are very ignorant; but it appears to me probable; that an accidental physical cause may account for this phenomenon; and prove it not to be a law of nature。 I have met with some pertinent observations on the subject in Forster's Account of the Isles of the South Sea; that will explain my meaning。 After observing that of the two sexes amongst animals; the most vigorous and hottest constitution always prevails; and produces its kind; he adds;〃If this be applied to the inhabitants of Africa; it is evident that the men there; accustomed to polygamy; are enervated by the use of so many women; and therefore less vigorous; the women on the contrary; are of a hotter constitution; not only on account of their more irritable nerves; more sensitive organization; and more lively fancy; but likewise because they are deprived in their matrimony of that share of physical love which in a monogamous condition; would all be theirs; and thus for the above reasons; the generality of children are born females。〃 〃In the greater part of Europe it has been proved by the most accurate lists of mortality; that the proportion of men to women is nearly equal; or; if any difference takes place; the males born are more numerous; in the proportion of 105 to 100。〃 The necessity of polygamy; therefore; does not appear; yet when a man seduces a woman; it should I think; be termed a LEFT…HANDED marriage; and the man should be LEGALLY obliged to maintain the woman and her children; unless adultery; a natural divorcement; abrogated the law。 And this law should remain in force as long as the weakness of women caused the word seduction to be used as an excuse for their frailty and want of principle; nay; while they depend on man for a subsistence; instead of earning it by the exercise of their own hands or heads。 But these women should not in the full meaning of the relationship; be termed wives; or the very purpose of marriage would be subverted; and all those endearing charities that flow from personal fidelity; and give a sanctity to the tie; when neither love nor friendship unites the hearts; would melt into selfishness。 The woman who is faithful to the father of her children demands respect; and should not be treated like a prostitute; though I readily grant; that if it be necessary for a man and woman to live together in order to bring up their offspring; nature never intended that a man should have more than one wife。 Still; highly as I respect marriage; as the foundation of almost every social virtue; I cannot avoid feeling the most lively compassion for those unfortunate females who are broken off from society; and by one error torn from all those affections and relationships that improve the heart and mind。 It does not frequently even deserve the name of error; for many innocent girls become the dupes of a sincere affectionate heart; and still more are; as it may emphatically be termed; RUINED before they know the difference between virtue and vice: and thus prepared by their education for infamy; they become infamous。 Asylums and Magdalens are not the proper remedies for these abuses。 It is justice; not charity; that is wanting in the world! A woman who has lost her honour; imagines that she cannot fall lower; and as for recovering her former station; it is impossible; no exertion can wash this stain away。 Losing thus every spur; and having no other means of support; prostitution becomes her only refuge; and the character is quickly depraved by circumstances over which the poor wretch has little power; unless she possesses an uncommon portion of sense and loftiness of spirit。 Necessity never makes prostitution the business of men's lives; though numberless are the women who are thus rendered systematically vicious。 This; however; arises; in a great degree; from the state of idleness in which women are educated; who are always taught to look up to man for a maintenance; and to consider their persons as the proper return for his exertions to support them。 Meretricious airs; and the whole science of wantonness; has then a more powerful stimulus than either appetite or vanity; and this remark gives force to the prevailing opinion; that with chastity all is lost that is respectable in woman。 Her character depends on the observance of one virtue; though the only passion fostered in her heartis love。 Nay the honour of a woman is not made even to depend on her will。 When Richardson makes Clarissa tell Lovelace that he had robbed her of her honour; he must have had strange notions of honour and virtue。 For; miserable beyond all names of misery is the condition of a being; who could be degraded without its own consent! This excess of strictness I have heard vindicated as a salutary error。 I shall answer in the words of Leibnitz〃Errors are often useful; but it is commonly to remedy other errors。〃 Most of the evils of life arise from a desire of present enjoyment that outruns itself。 The obedience required of women in the marriage state; comes under this description; the mind; naturally weakened by depending on authority; never exerts its own powers; and the obedient wife is thus rendered a weak indolent mother。 Or; supposing that this is not always the consequence; a future state of existence is scarcely taken into the reckoning when only negative virtues are cultivated。 For in treating of morals; particularly when women are alluded to; writers have too often considered virtue in a very limited sense; and made the foundation of it SOLELY worldly utility; nay; a still more fragile base has been given to this stupendous fabric; and the wayward fluctuating feelings of men have been made the standard of virtue。 Yes; virtue as well as religion; has been subjected to the decisions of taste。 It would almost provoke a smile of contempt; if the vain absurdities of man did not strike us on all sides; to observe; how eager men are to degrade the sex from whom they pretend to receive the chief pleasure of life; and I have frequently; wit