phenomenology of mind-第70章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！


knowing　its　own　spontaneous　activity　in　opposition　to　them；　to　follow　the　bent　of　its　own
inclinations；　affections；　and　emotions；　and　carry　off　thence　what　is　merely　of　particular　and　special
moment　for　itself；　and　thus　make　what　is　objective　conform　to　itself。　In　the　former　it　behaves
negatively　towards　itself　as　single　and　individual　mind；　in　the　latter　negatively　towards　itself　as　the
universal　being。

In　the　former　aspect　independence　＇or　self…dependence＇　gives　what　is　met　with　merely　the　form　of
conscious　individuality　in　general；　and　as　regards　the　content　remains　within　the　general　reality
given；　in　the　second　aspect；　however；　it　gives　the　reality　at　least　a　certain　special　modification；
which　does　not　contradict　its　essential　content；　or　even　a　modification　by　which　the　individual　qua
particular　reality　and　peculiar　content　sets　itself　against　the　general　reality。　This　opposition
becomes　a　form　of　wrongdoing　when　the　individual　cancels　that　reality　in　a　merely　particular
manner；　or　when　it　does　so　in　a　manner　that　is　general　and　thus　for　all；　when　it　puts　another　world；
another　right；　law；　and　custom　in　place　of　those　already　there。

Observational　psychology；　which　in　the　first　instance　states　what　observation　finds　regarding　the
general　forms　brought　to　its　notice　in　the　active　consciousness；　discovers　all　sorts　of　faculties；
inclinations；　and　passions；　and　since；　while　narrating　what　this　collection　contains；　the
remembrance　of　the　unity　of　self…consciousness　is　not　to　be　suppressed；　observational　psychology
is　bound　to　get　the　length　at　least　of　wonderment　that　such　a　lot　and　such　a　miscellany　of　things　can
happen　to　be　somehow　alongside　one　another　in　the　mind　as　in　a　kind　of　bag；　more　especially
when　they　are　seen　to　be　not　lifeless　inert　things；　but　restless　active　processes。

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　3。　The　Law　of　Indiviuality

In　telling　over　these　various　faculties　observation　keeps　to　the　universal　aspect：　the　unity　of　these
multifarious　capacities　is　the　opposite　aspect　to　this　universality；　is　the　actual　concrete　individuality。

To　take　up　again　thus　the　different　concrete　individualities；　and　to　describe　how　one　man　has　more
inclination　for　this　the　other　for　that；　how　one　has　more　intelligence　than　the　other　—　all　this　is；
however；　something　much　more　uninteresting　than　even　to　reckon　up　the　species　of　insects；
mosses；　and　so　on。　For　these　latter　give　observation　the　right　to　take　them　thus　individually　and
disconnectedly　（begrifflos）；　because　they　belong　essentially　to　the　sphere　of　fortuitous　detailed
particulars。　To　take　conscious　individuality　on　the　other　hand；　as　a　particular　phenomenal　entity；
and　treat　it　in　so　wooden　a　fashion；　is　self…contradictory；　because　the　essential　nature　of
individuality　lies　in　the　universal　element　of　mind。　Since；　however；　the　process　of　apprehending　it
causes　it　at　the　same　time　to　pass　into　the　form　of　universality；　to　apprehend　it　is　to　find　its　law；
and　seems　in　this　way　to　have　a　rational　purpose　in　view；　and　a　necessary　function　to　fulfil。

The　moments　constituting　the　content　of　the　law　are　on　the　one　hand　individuality　itself；　on　the
other　its　universal　inorganic　nature；　viz。　the　given　circumstances；　situation；　habits；　customs；　religion；
and　so　forth；　from　these　the　determinate　individuality　is　to　be　understood　and　comprehended。
They　contain　something　specific；　determinate；　as　well　as　universal；　and　are　at　the　same　time
something　lying　at　hand；　which　furnishes　material　for　observation　and　on　the　other　side　expresses
itself　in　the　form　of　individuality。

The　law　of　this　relation　of　the　two　sides　has　now　to　contain　and　express　the　sort　of　effect　and
influence　these　determinate　circumstances　exert　on　individuality。　This　individuality；　however　just
consists　both　in　being　the　universal；　and　hence　in　passively　and　directly　assimilating　and　blending
with　the　given　universals；　the　customs；　habits；　etc。；　thus　becoming　conformed　to　them；　as　also　in
taking　up　an　attitude　of　opposition　towards　them　and　thus　transforming　and　transmuting　them；　and
again　in　behaving　towards　them　in　its　individual　character　with　complete　indifference；　neither
allowing　them　to　exert　an　influence　over　it；　nor　setting　itself　actively　against　them。　On　that　account
what　is　to　have　an　influence　on　individuality；　and　what　sort　of　influence　it　is　to　have　—　which；
properly　speaking；　mean　the　same　thin…depend　entirely　on　individuality　itself：　to　say　that　by　such
and　such　an　influence　this　individuality　has　become　this　specifically　determinate　individuality　means
nothing　else　than　saying　it　has　been　this　all　along。　Circumstances；　situation；　customs；　and　so　on；
which　show　themselves　on　one　side　as　something　given；　and　on　the　other　as　within　this　specific
individuality；　reveal　merely　indeterminate　nature　of　individuality；　which　is　not　the　point　under
consideration。　If　these　circumstances；　style　of　thought；　customs；　the　whole　state　of　the　world；　in
short；　had　not　been；　then　assuredly　the　individual　would　not　have　been　what　he　is；　for　all　the
elements　that　find　a　place　in　this　〃　state　of　the　world　〃　constitute　this　universal　substance。

By　the　way；　however；　in　which　the　state　of　the　world　has　affected　in　particular　any　given　individual
—　and　it　is　such　an　individual　that　has　to　be　comprehended　—　it　must　itself　have　assumed　a
particular　shape　on　its　own　account；　and　have　operated　upon　the　individual　in　the　specific
character　which　it　assumed。　Only　so　could　it　have　made　the　individual　the　specific　particular
individual　he　is。　If　the　external　element　is　so　constituted　in　and　for　itself　as　it　appears　in
individuality；　the　latter　would　be　comprehended　from　the　nature　of　the　former。　We　should　have　a
double　gallery　of　pictures；　one　of　which　would　be　the　reflexion　of　the　other：　the　one　the　gallery　of
external　circumstance　completely　encompassing；　circumscribing；　and　determining　the　individual；
the　other　the　same　gallery　translated　into　the　form　in　which　those　circumstances　are　in　the
conscious　individual：　the　former　the　spherical　surface；　the　latter　the　centre　reflectively　representing
that　surface　within　it。

But　the　spherical　surface；　the　world　for　the　individual；　carries　on　the　face　of　it　this　double　meaning：
it　is　in　and　for　itself　the　actual　world　and　situation；　and　it　is　the　world　of　the　individual。　It　is　the
world　of　the　individual　either　in　so　far　as　this　individual　was　merely　fused　and　blended　with　it；　had
let　that　world；　just　as　it　is；　pass　into　its　own　nature；　and　had　taken　up　towards　it　merely　the　attitude
of　a　formal　consciousness；　or；　on　the　other　hand；　it　is　the　world　of　the　individual　in　the　sense　in
which　the　given　has　been　transformed　and　transmuted　by　that　individual。

Since　reality　is　capable　of　having　this　twofold　meaning　on　account　of　this　freedom　of　the　individual；
the　world　of　the　individual　is　only　to　be　understood　from　the　individual　himself；　and　the　influence　of
reality　upon　the　individual；　a　reality　which　is　represented　as　having　a　being　all　its　own　（an　und　für
sich）；　receives　through　this　individual　absolutely　the　opposite　significance　—　the　individual　either
lets　the　stream　of　reality　flowing　in　upon　it　have　its　way；　or　breaks　off　and　diverts　the　current　of　its
influence。　In　consequence　of　this；　however；　〃　psychological　necessity〃　becomes　an　empty　phrase；
so　empty　that　there　is　the　absolute　possibility　that　what　is　said　to　have　this　influence　could　equally
well　not　have　had　it。

Herewith　drops　out　of　account　that　existence　which　was　to　be　something　all　by　itself；　and　was
meant　to　constitute　one　aspect；　and　that　the　universal　aspect；　of　a　law。　Individuality　is　what　its
world；　in　the　sense　of　its　own　world；　is。　Individuality　itself　is　the　cycle　of　its　own　action；　in　which　it
has　presented　and　established　itself　as　reality；　and　is　simply　and　solely　a　unity　of　what　is　given　and
what　is　constructed　—　a　unity　aspects　do　not　fall　apart；　as　in　the　idea　of　psychological　law；　into　a
world　given　per　se　and　an　individuality　existing　for　itself。　Or　if　those　aspects　are　thus　considered
each　by　itself；　there　is　no　necessity　to　be　found　between　them；　and　no　law　of　their　relation　to　one
another。　




c