robert louis stevenson-第33章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
eluctance。
〃Mr Henley； despite his absurdities of ''Tis' and 'it were；' is a fairly competent literary craftsman； and he is quite gifted enough to make a plain man's plain meaning an evident thing if he chose to do it。 But if for the friend for whom 'first and last he did share' he can only show us the figure of one 'who was at bottom an
excellent fellow；' and who had 'an entire contempt' for the consequences of his own acts； he presents a picture which can only purposely be obscured。 。 。 。
〃All I know of Robert Louis Stevenson I have learned from his books； and from one unexpected impromptu letter which he wrote to me years ago in friendly recognition of my own work。 I add the testimonies of friends who may have been of less actual service to him than Mr Henley； but who surely loved him better and more lastingly。 These do not represent him as the victim of an overweening personal vanity； nor as a person reckless of the consequences of his own acts； nor as a Pecksniff who consoled himself for moral failure out of the Shorter Catechism。 The books and the friends amongst them show me an erratic yet lovable personality； a man of devotion and courage； a loyal； charming； and rather irresponsible person whose very slight faults were counter… balanced many times over by very solid virtues。。。。
〃To put the thing flatly； it is not a heroism to cling to mere existence。 The basest of us can do that。 But it is a heroism to maintain an equable and unbroken cheerfulness in the face of death。 For my own part； I never bowed at the literary shrine Mr Henley and his friends were at so great pains to rear。 I am not disposed to think more loftily than I ever thought of their idol。 But the Man … the Man was made of enduring valour and childlike charm； and these will keep him alive when his detractors are dead and buried。〃
As to the Christian name； it is notorious that he was christened Robert Lewis … the Lewis being after his maternal grandfather … Dr Lewis Balfour。 Some attempt has been made to show that the Louis was adopted because so many cousins and relatives had also been so christened； but the most likely explanation I have ever heard was that his father changed the name to Louis； that there might be no chance through it of any notion of association with a very prominent noisy person of the name of Lewis； in Edinburgh； towards whom Thomas Stevenson felt dislike； if not positive animosity。 Anyhow； it is clear from the entries in the register of pupils at the Edinburgh Academy； in the two years when Stevenson was there； that in early youth he was called Robert only； for in the school list for 1862 the name appears as Robert Stevenson； without the Lewis； while in the 1883 list it is given as Lewis Robert Stevenson。 Clearly if in earlier years Stevenson was； in his family and elsewhere； called ROBERT； there could have then arisen no risk of confusion with any of his relatives who bore the name of Lewis； and all this goes to support the view which I have given above。 Anyhow he ceased to be called Robert at home； and ceased in 1863 to be Robert on the Edinburgh Academy list； and became Lewis Robert。 Whether my view is right or not； he was thenceforward called Louis in his family； and the name uniformly spelt Louis。 What blame on Stevenson's part could be attached to this family determination it is hard to see … people are absolutely free to spell their names as they please； and the matter would not be worth a moment's attention； or the waste of one drop of ink； had not Mr Henley chosen to be very nasty about the name； and in the PALL MALL MAGAZINE article persisted in printing it Lewis as though that were worthy of him and of it。 That was not quite the unkindest cut of all； but it was as unkind as it was trumpery。 Mr Christie Murray neatly set off the trumpery spite of this in the following passage：
〃Stevenson； it appears； according to his friend's judgment； was 'incessantly and passionately interested in Stevenson；' but most of us are incessantly and passionately interested in ourselves。 'He could not be in the same room with a mirror but he must invite its confidences every time he passed it。' I remember that George Sala； who was certainly under no illusion as to his own personal aspect； made public confession of an identical foible。 Mr Henley may not have an equal affection for the looking…glass； but he is a very poor and unimaginative reader who does not see him gloating over the god…like proportions of the shadow he sends sprawling over his own page。 I make free to say that a more self…conscious person than Mr Henley does not live。 'The best and most interesting part of Stevenson's life will never get written … even by me；' says Mr Henley。
〃There is one curious little mark of animus； or one equally curious affectation … I do not profess to know which； and it is most probably a compound of the two … in Mr Henley's guardedly spiteful essay which asks for notice。 The dead novelist signed his second name on his title…pages and his private correspondence 'Louis。' Mr Henley spells it 'Lewis。' Is this intended to say that Stevenson took an ornamenting liberty with his own baptismal appellation？ If so； why not say the thing and have done with it？ Or is it one of Mr Henley's wilful ridiculosities？ It seems to stand for some sort of meaning； and to me； at least； it offers a jarring hint of small spitefulness which might go for nothing if it were not so well borne out by the general tone of Mr Henley's article。 It is a small matter enough； God knows； but it is precisely because it is so very small that it irritates。〃
CHAPTER XXVI … HERO…VILLAINS
IN truth； it must indeed be here repeated that Stevenson for the reason he himself gave about DEACON BRODIE utterly fails in that healthy hatred of 〃fools and scoundrels〃 on which Carlyle somewhat incontinently dilated。 Nor does he； as we have seen； draw the line between hero and villain of the piece； as he ought to have done； and； even for his own artistic purposes； has it too much all on one side； to express it simply。 Art demands relief from any one phase of human nature； more especially of that phase； and even from what is morbid or exceptional。 Admitting that such natures； say as Huish； the cockney； in the EBB…TIDE on the one side； and Prince Otto on the other are possible； it is yet absolutely demanded that they should not stand ALONE； but have their due complement and balance present in the piece also to deter and finally to tell on them in the action。 If 〃a knave or villain；〃 as George Eliot aptly said； is but a fool with a circumbendibus； this not only wants to be shown； but to have that definite human counterpart and corrective； and this not in any indirect and perfunctory way； but in a direct and effective sense。 It is here that Stevenson fails … fails absolutely in most of his work； save the very latest … fails； as has been shown； in THE MASTER OF BALLANTRAE； as it were almost of perverse and set purpose； in lack of what one might call ethical decision which causes him to waver or seem to waver and wobble in his judgment of his characters or in his sympathy with them or for them。 Thus he fails to give his readers the proper cue which was his duty both as man and artist to have given。 The highest art and the lowest are indeed here at one in demanding moral poise； if we may call it so； that however crudely in the low； and however artistically and refinedly in the high； vice should not only not be set forth as absolutely triumphing； nor virtue as being absolutely； outwardly； and inwardly defeated。 It is here the same in the melodrama of the transpontine theatre as in the tragedies of the Greek dramatists and Shakespeare。 〃The evening brings a' 'hame'〃 and the end ought to show something to satisfy the innate craving （for it is innate； thank Heaven！ and low and high alike in moments of ELEVATED IMPRESSION； acknowledge it and bow to it） else there can scarce be true DENOUEMENT and the sense of any moral rectitude or law remain as felt or acknowledged in human nature or in the Universe itself。
Stevenson's toleration and
