贝壳电子书 > 英文原著电子书 > concerning civil government >

第31章

concerning civil government-第31章

小说: concerning civil government 字数: 每页4000字

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!



of the forms and rules of the government; for if the usurper extend

his power beyond what; of right; belonged to the lawful princes or

governors of the commonwealth; it is tyranny added to usurpation。

  198。 In all lawful governments the designation of the persons who

are to bear rule being as natural and necessary a part as the form

of the government itself; and that which had its establishment

originally from the people… the anarchy being much alike; to have no

form of government at all; or to agree that it shall be monarchical;

yet appoint no way to design the person that shall have the power

and be the monarch… all commonwealths; therefore; with the form of

government established; have rules also of appointing and conveying

the right to those who are to have any share in the public

authority; and whoever gets into the exercise of any part of the power

by other ways than what the laws of the community have prescribed hath

no right to be obeyed; though the form of the commonwealth be still

preserved; since he is not the person the laws have appointed; and;

consequently; not the person the people have consented to。 Nor can

such an usurper; or any deriving from him; ever have a title till

the people are both at liberty to consent; and have actually

consented; to allow and confirm in him the power he hath till then

usurped。

                            Chapter XVIII

                              Of Tyranny



  199。 As usurpation is the exercise of power which another hath a

right to; so tyranny is the exercise of power beyond right; which

nobody can have a right to; and this is making use of the power any

one has in his hands; not for the good of those who are under it;

but for his own private; separate advantage。 When the governor;

however entitled; makes not the law; but his will; the rule; and his

commands and actions are not directed to the preservation of the

properties of his people; but the satisfaction of his own ambition;

revenge; covetousness; or any other irregular passion。

  200。 If one can doubt this to be truth or reason because it comes

from the obscure hand of a subject; I hope the authority of a king

will make it pass with him。 King James; in his speech to the

Parliament; 16O3; tells them thus: 〃I will ever prefer the weal of the

public and of the whole commonwealth; in making of good laws and

constitutions; to any particular and private ends of mine; thinking

ever the wealth and weal of the commonwealth to be my greatest weal

and worldly felicity… a point wherein a lawful king doth directly

differ from a tyrant; for I do acknowledge that the special and

greatest point of difference that is between a rightful king and an

usurping tyrant is this… that whereas the proud and ambitious tyrant

doth think his kingdom and people are only ordained for satisfaction

of his desires and unreasonable appetites; the righteous and just king

doth; by the contrary; acknowledge himself to be ordained for the

procuring of the wealth and property of his people。〃 And again; in his

speech to the Parliament; 1609; he hath these words: 〃The king binds

himself; by a double oath; to the observation of the fundamental

laws of his kingdom… tacitly; as by being a king; and so bound to

protect; as well the people as the laws of his kingdom; and

expressly by his oath at his coronation; so as every just king; in a

settled kingdom; is bound to observe that paction made to his

people; by his laws; in framing his government agreeable thereunto;

according to that paction which God made with Noah after the deluge:

'Hereafter; seed…time; and harvest; and cold; and heat; and summer;

and winter; and day; and night; shall not cease while the earth

remaineth。' And therefore a king; governing in a settled kingdom;

leaves to be a king; and degenerates into a tyrant; as soon as he

leaves off to rule according to his laws。〃 And a little after:

〃Therefore; all kings that are not tyrants; or perjured; will be

glad to bound themselves within the limits of their laws; and they

that persuade them the contrary are vipers; pests; both against them

and the commonwealth。〃 Thus; that learned king; who well understood

the notions of things; makes the difference betwixt a king and a

tyrant to consist only in this: that one makes the laws the bounds

of his power and the good of the public the end of his government; the

other makes all give way to his own will and appetite。

  201。 It is a mistake to think this fault is proper only to

monarchies。 Other forms of government are liable to it as well as

that; for wherever the power that is put in any hands for the

government of the people and the preservation of their properties is

applied to other ends; and made use of to impoverish; harass; or

subdue them to the arbitrary and irregular commands of those that have

it; there it presently becomes tyranny; whether those that thus use it

are one or many。 Thus we read of the thirty tyrants at Athens; as well

as one at Syracuse; and the intolerable dominion of the Decemviri at

Rome was nothing better。

  202。 Wherever law ends; tyranny begins; if the law be transgressed

to another's harm; and whosoever in authority exceeds the power

given him by the law; and makes use of the force he has under his

command to compass that upon the subject which the law allows not;

ceases in that to be a magistrate; and acting without authority may be

opposed; as any other man who by force invades the right of another。

This is acknowledged in subordinate magistrates。 He that hath

authority to seize my person in the street may be opposed as a thief

and a robber if he endeavours to break into my house to execute a

writ; notwithstanding that I know he has such a warrant and such a

legal authority as will empower him to arrest me abroad。 And why

this should not hold in the highest; as well as in the most inferior

magistrate; I would gladly be informed。 Is it reasonable that the

eldest brother; because he has the greatest part of his father's

estate; should thereby have a right to take away any of his younger

brothers' portions? Or that a rich man; who possessed a whole country;

should from thence have a right to seize; when he pleased; the cottage

and garden of his poor neighbour? The being rightfully possessed of

great power and riches; exceedingly beyond the greatest part of the

sons of Adam; is so far from being an excuse; much less a reason for

rapine and oppression; which the endamaging another without

authority is; that it is a great aggravation of it。 For exceeding

the bounds of authority is no more a right in a great than a petty

officer; no more justifiable in a king than a constable。 But so much

the worse in him as that he has more trust put in him; is supposed;

from the advantage of education and counsellors; to have better

knowledge and less reason to do it; having already a greater share

than the rest of his brethren。

  203。 May the commands; then; of a prince be opposed? May he be

resisted; as often as any one shall find himself aggrieved; and but

imagine he has not right done him? This will unhinge and overturn

all polities; and instead of government and order; leave nothing but

anarchy and confusion。

  204。 To this I answer: That force is to be opposed to nothing but to

unjust and unlawful force。 Whoever makes any opposition in any other

case draws on himself a just condemnation; both from God and man;

and so no such danger or confusion will follow; as is often suggested。

For…

  205。 First。 As in some countries the person of the prince by the law

is sacred; and so whatever he commands or does; his person is still

free from all question or violence; not liable to force; or any

judicial censure or condemnation。 But yet opposition may be made to

the illegal acts of any inferior officer or other commissioned by him;

unless he will; by actually putting himself into a state of war with

his people; dissolve the government; and leave them to that defence;

which belongs to every one in the state of Nature。 For of such things;

who can tell what the end will be? 

返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 1 0

你可能喜欢的