贝壳电子书 > 英文原著电子书 > the critique of pure reason >

第106章

the critique of pure reason-第106章

小说: the critique of pure reason 字数: 每页4000字

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!




could be placed at the head of the series of phenomena; except one

which was itself a phenomenon and consequently a member of the series。



  *For the understanding cannot admit among phenomena a condition

which is itself empirically unconditioned。 But if it is possible to

cogitate an intelligible condition… one which is not a member of the

series of phenomena… for a conditioned phenomenon; without breaking

the series of empirical conditions; such a condition may be admissible

as empirically unconditioned; and the empirical regress continue

regular; unceasing; and intact。



    III。 Solution of the Cosmological Idea of the Totality of

       the Deduction of Cosmical Events from their Causes。



  There are only two modes of causality cogitable… the causality of

nature or of freedom。 The first is the conjunction of a particular

state with another preceding it in the world of sense; the former

following the latter by virtue of a law。 Now; as the causality of

phenomena is subject to conditions of time; and the preceding state;

if it had always existed; could not have produced an effect which

would make its first appearance at a particular time; the causality of

a cause must itself be an effect… must itself have begun to be; and

therefore; according to the principle of the understanding; itself

requires a cause。

  We must understand; on the contrary; by the term freedom; in the

cosmological sense; a faculty of the spontaneous origination of a

state; the causality of which; therefore; is not subordinated to

another cause determining it in time。 Freedom is in this sense a

pure transcendental idea; which; in the first place; contains no

empirical element; the object of which; in the second place; cannot be

given or determined in any experience; because it is a universal law

of the very possibility of experience; that everything which happens

must have a cause; that consequently the causality of a cause; being

itself something that has happened; must also have a cause。 In this

view of the case; the whole field of experience; how far soever it may

extend; contains nothing that is not subject to the laws of nature。

But; as we cannot by this means attain to an absolute totality of

conditions in reference to the series of causes and effects; reason

creates the idea of a spontaneity; which can begin to act of itself;

and without any external cause determining it to action; according

to the natural law of causality。

  It is especially remarkable that the practical conception of freedom

is based upon the transcendental idea; and that the question of the

possibility of the former is difficult only as it involves the

consideration of the truth of the latter。 Freedom; in the practical

sense; is the independence of the will of coercion by sensuous

impulses。 A will is sensuous; in so far as it is pathologically

affected (by sensuous impulses); it is termed animal (arbitrium

brutum); when it is pathologically necessitated。 The human will is

certainly an arbitrium sensitivum; not brutum; but liberum; because

sensuousness does not necessitate its action; a faculty existing in

man of self…determination; independently of all sensuous coercion。

  It is plain that; if all causality in the world of sense were

natural… and natural only… every event would be determined by

another according to necessary laws; and that; consequently;

phenomena; in so far as they determine the will; must necessitate

every action as a natural effect from themselves; and thus all

practical freedom would fall to the ground with the transcendental

idea。 For the latter presupposes that although a certain thing has not

happened; it ought to have happened; and that; consequently; its

phenomenal cause was not so powerful and determinative as to exclude

the causality of our will… a causality capable of producing effects

independently of and even in opposition to the power of natural

causes; and capable; consequently; of spontaneously originating a

series of events。

  Here; too; we find it to be the case; as we generally found in the

self…contradictions and perplexities of a reason which strives to pass

the bounds of possible experience; that the problem is properly not

physiological; but transcendental。 The question of the possibility

of freedom does indeed concern psychology; but; as it rests upon

dialectical arguments of pure reason; its solution must engage the

attention of transcendental philosophy。 Before attempting this

solution; a task which transcendental philosophy cannot decline; it

will be advisable to make a remark with regard to its procedure in the

settlement of the question。

  If phenomena were things in themselves; and time and space forms

of the existence of things; condition and conditioned would always

be members of the same series; and thus would arise in the present

case the antinomy common to all transcendental ideas… that their

series is either too great or too small for the understanding。 The

dynamical ideas; which we are about to discuss in this and the

following section; possess the peculiarity of relating to an object;

not considered as a quantity; but as an existence; and thus; in the

discussion of the present question; we may make abstraction of the

quantity of the series of conditions; and consider merely the

dynamical relation of the condition to the conditioned。 The

question; then; suggests itself; whether freedom is possible; and;

if it is; whether it can consist with the universality of the

natural law of causality; and; consequently; whether we enounce a

proper disjunctive proposition when we say: 〃Every effect must have

its origin either in nature or in freedom;〃 or whether both cannot

exist together in the same event in different relations。 The principle

of an unbroken connection between all events in the phenomenal

world; in accordance with the unchangeable laws of nature; is a

well…established principle of transcendental analytic which admits

of no exception。 The question; therefore; is: 〃Whether an effect;

determined according to the laws of nature; can at the same time be

produced by a free agent; or whether freedom and nature mutually

exclude each other?〃 And here; the common but fallacious hypothesis of

the absolute reality of phenomena manifests its injurious influence in

embarrassing the procedure of reason。 For if phenomena are things in

themselves; freedom is impossible。 In this case; nature is the

complete and all…sufficient cause of every event; and condition and

conditioned; cause and effect are contained in the same series; and

necessitated by the same law。 If; on the contrary; phenomena are

held to be; as they are in fact; nothing more than mere

representations; connected with each other in accordance with

empirical laws; they must have a ground which is not phenomenal。 But

the causality of such an intelligible cause is not determined or

determinable by phenomena; although its effects; as phenomena; must be

determined by other phenomenal existences。 This cause and its

causality exist therefore out of and apart from the series of

phenomena; while its effects do exist and are discoverable in the

series of empirical conditions。 Such an effect may therefore be

considered to be free in relation to its intelligible cause; and

necessary in relation to the phenomena from which it is a necessary

consequence… a distinction which; stated in this perfectly general and

abstract manner; must appear in the highest degree subtle and obscure。

The sequel will explain。 It is sufficient; at present; to remark that;

as the complete and unbroken connection of phenomena is an unalterable

law of nature; freedom is impossible… on the supposition that

phenomena are absolutely real。 Hence those philosophers who adhere

to the common opinion on this subject can never succeed in reconciling

the ideas of nature and freedom。



     Possibility of Freedom in Harmony with the Universal Law

                

返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0

你可能喜欢的