±´¿Çµç×ÓÊé > Ó¢ÎÄÔ­Öøµç×ÓÊé > the sequel of appomattox >

µÚ24ÕÂ

the sequel of appomattox-µÚ24ÕÂ

С˵£º the sequel of appomattox ×ÖÊý£º ÿҳ4000×Ö

°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡



¡¡command¡¡everywhere¡¡used¡¡their¡¡influence¡¡to¡¡secure¡¡moderate¡¡action¡¡by¡¡the¡¡conventions£»¡¡and¡¡for¡¡this¡¡they¡¡were¡¡showered¡¡with¡¡abuse¡£

As¡¡provided¡¡by¡¡the¡¡reconstruction¡¡acts£»¡¡the¡¡new¡¡constitutions¡¡were¡¡submitted¡¡to¡¡the¡¡electorate¡¡created¡¡by¡¡those¡¡instruments¡£¡¡Unless¡¡a¡¡majority¡¡of¡¡the¡¡registered¡¡voters¡¡in¡¡a¡¡State¡¡should¡¡take¡¡part¡¡in¡¡the¡¡election£»¡¡the¡¡reconstruction¡¡would¡¡fail¡¡and¡¡the¡¡State¡¡would¡¡remain¡¡under¡¡military¡¡rule¡£¡¡The¡¡whites¡¡now¡¡inaugurated¡¡a¡¡more¡¡systematic¡¡policy¡¡of¡¡abstention¡¡and¡¡in¡¡Alabama£»¡¡on¡¡February¡¡4£»¡¡1868£»¡¡succeeded¡¡in¡¡holding¡¡the¡¡total¡¡vote¡¡below¡¡a¡¡majority¡£¡¡Congress¡¡then¡¡rushed¡¡to¡¡the¡¡rescue¡¡of¡¡radicalism¡¡with¡¡the¡¡act¡¡of¡¡the¡¡11th¡¡of¡¡March£»¡¡which¡¡provided¡¡that¡¡a¡¡mere¡¡majority¡¡of¡¡those¡¡voting¡¡in¡¡the¡¡State¡¡was¡¡sufficient¡¡to¡¡inaugurate¡¡reconstruction¡£¡¡Arkansas¡¡had¡¡followed¡¡the¡¡lead¡¡of¡¡Alabama£»¡¡but¡¡too¡¡late£»¡¡in¡¡Mississippi¡¡the¡¡constitution¡¡was¡¡defeated¡¡by¡¡a¡¡majority¡¡vote£»¡¡in¡¡Texas¡¡the¡¡convention¡¡had¡¡made¡¡no¡¡provision¡¡for¡¡a¡¡vote£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡Virginia¡¡the¡¡commanding¡¡general£»¡¡disapproving¡¡of¡¡the¡¡work¡¡of¡¡the¡¡convention£»¡¡refused¡¡to¡¡pay¡¡the¡¡expenses¡¡of¡¡an¡¡election¡£¡¡In¡¡the¡¡other¡¡six¡¡States¡¡the¡¡constitutions¡¡were¡¡adopted¡£*

*¡¡Except¡¡in¡¡Texas£»¡¡the¡¡work¡¡of¡¡constitution¡¡making¡¡was¡¡completed¡¡between¡¡November¡¡5£»¡¡1867£»¡¡and¡¡May¡¡18£»¡¡1868¡£

These¡¡elections¡¡gave¡¡rise¡¡to¡¡more¡¡violent¡¡contests¡¡than¡¡before¡£¡¡They¡¡also¡¡were¡¡double¡¡elections£»¡¡as¡¡the¡¡voters¡¡cast¡¡ballots¡¡for¡¡state¡¡and¡¡local¡¡officials¡¡and¡¡at¡¡the¡¡same¡¡time¡¡for¡¡or¡¡against¡¡the¡¡constitution¡£¡¡The¡¡radical¡¡nominations¡¡were¡¡made¡¡by¡¡the¡¡Union¡¡League¡¡and¡¡the¡¡Freedmen's¡¡Bureau£»¡¡and¡¡nearly¡¡all¡¡radicals¡¡who¡¡had¡¡been¡¡members¡¡of¡¡conventions¡¡were¡¡nominated¡¡and¡¡elected¡¡to¡¡office¡£¡¡The¡¡Negroes£»¡¡expecting¡¡now¡¡to¡¡reap¡¡some¡¡benefits¡¡of¡¡reconstruction£»¡¡frequently¡¡brought¡¡sacks¡¡to¡¡the¡¡polls¡¡to¡¡¡¨put¡¡the¡¡franchise¡¡in¡£¡¨¡¡The¡¡elections¡¡were¡¡all¡¡over¡¡by¡¡June¡¡1868£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡newly¡¡elected¡¡legislatures¡¡promptly¡¡ratified¡¡the¡¡Fourteenth¡¡Amendment¡£

It¡¡now¡¡remained¡¡for¡¡Congress¡¡to¡¡approve¡¡the¡¡work¡¡done¡¡in¡¡the¡¡South¡¡and¡¡to¡¡readmit¡¡the¡¡reorganized¡¡states¡£¡¡The¡¡case¡¡of¡¡Alabama¡¡gave¡¡some¡¡trouble¡£¡¡Even¡¡Stevens£»¡¡for¡¡a¡¡time£»¡¡thought¡¡that¡¡this¡¡state¡¡should¡¡stay¡¡out£»¡¡but¡¡there¡¡was¡¡danger¡¡in¡¡delay¡£¡¡The¡¡success¡¡of¡¡the¡¡abstention¡¡policy¡¡in¡¡Alabama¡¡and¡¡Arkansas¡¡and¡¡the¡¡reviving¡¡interest¡¡of¡¡the¡¡whites¡¡foreshadowed¡¡white¡¡majorities¡¡in¡¡some¡¡places£»¡¡the¡¡scalawags¡¡began¡¡to¡¡forsake¡¡the¡¡radical¡¡party¡¡for¡¡the¡¡conservatives£»¡¡and¡¡there¡¡were¡¡Democratic¡¡gains¡¡in¡¡the¡¡North¡¡in¡¡1867¡£¡¡Only¡¡six¡¡states£»¡¡New¡¡York¡¡and¡¡five¡¡New¡¡England¡¡States£»¡¡allowed¡¡the¡¡Negro¡¡to¡¡vote£»¡¡while¡¡four¡¡states£»¡¡Minnesota£»¡¡Michigan£»¡¡Kansas£»¡¡and¡¡Ohio£»¡¡voted¡¡down¡¡Negro¡¡suffrage¡¡after¡¡the¡¡passage¡¡of¡¡the¡¡reconstruction¡¡acts¡£¡¡The¡¡ascendancy¡¡of¡¡the¡¡radicals¡¡in¡¡Congress¡¡was¡¡menaced¡£¡¡The¡¡radicals¡¡needed¡¡the¡¡support¡¡of¡¡their¡¡radical¡¡brethren¡¡in¡¡Southern¡¡States¡¡and¡¡they¡¡could¡¡not¡¡afford¡¡to¡¡wait¡¡for¡¡the¡¡Fourteenth¡¡Amendment¡¡to¡¡become¡¡a¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Constitution¡¡or¡¡to¡¡tolerate¡¡other¡¡delay¡£¡¡On¡¡the¡¡22d¡¡and¡¡the¡¡25th¡¡of¡¡June£»¡¡acts¡¡were¡¡therefore¡¡passed¡¡admitting¡¡seven¡¡states£»¡¡Alabama¡¡included£»¡¡to¡¡representation¡¡in¡¡Congress¡¡upon¡¡the¡¡¡¨fundamental¡¡condition¡¨¡¡that¡¡¡¨the¡¡constitutions¡¡of¡¡neither¡¡of¡¡said¡¡States¡¡shall¡¡ever¡¡be¡¡so¡¡amended¡¡or¡¡changed¡¡as¡¡to¡¡deprive¡¡any¡¡citizens¡¡or¡¡class¡¡of¡¡citizens¡¡of¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡¡of¡¡the¡¡right¡¡to¡¡vote¡¡in¡¡said¡¡State£»¡¡who¡¡are¡¡entitled¡¡to¡¡vote¡¡by¡¡the¡¡constitution¡¡thereof¡¡herein¡¡recognized¡£¡¨

The¡¡generals¡¡now¡¡turned¡¡over¡¡the¡¡government¡¡to¡¡the¡¡recently¡¡elected¡¡radical¡¡officials¡¡and¡¡retired¡¡into¡¡the¡¡background¡£¡¡Military¡¡reconstruction¡¡was¡¡thus¡¡accomplished¡¡in¡¡all¡¡the¡¡States¡¡except¡¡Virginia£»¡¡Mississippi£»¡¡and¡¡Texas¡£



CHAPTER¡¡VII¡£¡¡THE¡¡TRIAL¡¡OF¡¡PRESIDENT¡¡JOHNSON

While¡¡the¡¡radical¡¡program¡¡was¡¡being¡¡executed¡¡in¡¡the¡¡South£»¡¡Congress¡¡was¡¡engaged¡¡not¡¡only¡¡in¡¡supervising¡¡reconstruction¡¡but¡¡in¡¡subduing¡¡the¡¡Supreme¡¡Court¡¡and¡¡in¡¡¡¨conquering¡¨¡¡President¡¡Johnson¡£¡¡One¡¡must¡¡admire¡¡the¡¡efficiency¡¡of¡¡the¡¡radical¡¡machine¡£¡¡When¡¡the¡¡Southerners¡¡showed¡¡that¡¡they¡¡preferred¡¡military¡¡rule¡¡as¡¡permitted¡¡by¡¡the¡¡Act¡¡of¡¡the¡¡2nd¡¡of¡¡March£»¡¡Congress¡¡passed¡¡the¡¡Act¡¡of¡¡the¡¡23d¡¡of¡¡March¡¡which¡¡forced¡¡the¡¡reconstruction¡£¡¡When¡¡the¡¡President¡¡ventured¡¡to¡¡assert¡¡his¡¡power¡¡in¡¡behalf¡¡of¡¡a¡¡considerate¡¡administration¡¡of¡¡the¡¡reconstruction¡¡acts£»¡¡Congress¡¡took¡¡the¡¡power¡¡out¡¡of¡¡his¡¡hands¡¡by¡¡the¡¡law¡¡of¡¡the¡¡19th¡¡of¡¡July¡£¡¡The¡¡Southern¡¡plan¡¡to¡¡defeat¡¡the¡¡new¡¡state¡¡constitutions¡¡by¡¡abstention¡¡was¡¡no¡¡sooner¡¡made¡¡clear¡¡in¡¡the¡¡case¡¡of¡¡Alabama¡¡than¡¡Congress¡¡came¡¡to¡¡the¡¡rescue¡¡with¡¡the¡¡Act¡¡of¡¡March¡¡11£»¡¡1868¡£

Had¡¡it¡¡seemed¡¡necessary£»¡¡Congress¡¡would¡¡have¡¡handled¡¡the¡¡Supreme¡¡Court¡¡as¡¡it¡¡did¡¡the¡¡Southerners¡£¡¡The¡¡opponents¡¡of¡¡radical¡¡reconstruction¡¡were¡¡anxious¡¡to¡¡get¡¡the¡¡reconstruction¡¡laws¡¡of¡¡March¡¡1867£»¡¡before¡¡the¡¡Court¡£¡¡Chief¡¡Justice¡¡Chase¡¡was¡¡known¡¡to¡¡be¡¡opposed¡¡to¡¡military¡¡reconstruction£»¡¡and¡¡four¡¡other¡¡justices¡¡were£»¡¡it¡¡was¡¡believed£»¡¡doubtful¡¡of¡¡the¡¡constitutionality¡¡of¡¡the¡¡laws¡£¡¡A¡¡series¡¡of¡¡conservative¡¡decisions¡¡gave¡¡hope¡¡to¡¡those¡¡who¡¡looked¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Court¡¡for¡¡relief¡£¡¡The¡¡first¡¡decision£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡case¡¡of¡¡ex¡¡parte¡¡Milligan£»¡¡declared¡¡unconstitutional¡¡the¡¡trials¡¡of¡¡civilians¡¡by¡¡military¡¡commissions¡¡when¡¡civil¡¡courts¡¡were¡¡open¡£¡¡A¡¡few¡¡months¡¡later£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡cases¡¡of¡¡Cummings¡¡vs¡£¡¡Missouri¡¡and¡¡ex¡¡parte¡¡Garland£»¡¡the¡¡Court¡¡declared¡¡invalid£»¡¡because¡¡ex¡¡post¡¡facto£»¡¡the¡¡state¡¡laws¡¡designed¡¡to¡¡punish¡¡former¡¡Confederates¡£

But¡¡the¡¡first¡¡attempts¡¡to¡¡get¡¡the¡¡reconstruction¡¡acts¡¡before¡¡the¡¡Supreme¡¡Court¡¡failed¡£¡¡The¡¡State¡¡of¡¡Mississippi£»¡¡in¡¡April¡¡1867£»¡¡brought¡¡suit¡¡to¡¡restrain¡¡the¡¡President¡¡from¡¡executing¡¡the¡¡reconstruction¡¡acts¡£¡¡The¡¡Court¡¡refused¡¡to¡¡interfere¡¡with¡¡the¡¡executive¡£¡¡A¡¡similar¡¡suit¡¡was¡¡then¡¡brought¡¡against¡¡Secretary¡¡Stanton¡¡by¡¡Georgia¡¡with¡¡a¡¡like¡¡result¡£¡¡But¡¡in¡¡1868£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡case¡¡of¡¡ex¡¡parte¡¡McCardle£»¡¡it¡¡appeared¡¡that¡¡the¡¡question¡¡of¡¡the¡¡constitutionality¡¡of¡¡the¡¡reconstruction¡¡acts¡¡would¡¡be¡¡passed¡¡upon¡£¡¡McCardle£»¡¡a¡¡Mississippi¡¡editor¡¡arrested¡¡for¡¡opposition¡¡to¡¡reconstruction¡¡and¡¡convicted¡¡by¡¡military¡¡commission£»¡¡appealed¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Supreme¡¡Court£»¡¡which¡¡asserted¡¡its¡¡jurisdiction¡£¡¡But¡¡the¡¡radicals¡¡in¡¡alarm¡¡rushed¡¡through¡¡Congress¡¡an¡¡act¡¡£¨March¡¡27£»¡¡1868£©¡¡which¡¡took¡¡away¡¡from¡¡the¡¡Court¡¡its¡¡jurisdiction¡¡in¡¡cases¡¡arising¡¡under¡¡the¡¡reconstruction¡¡acts¡£¡¡The¡¡highest¡¡court¡¡was¡¡thus¡¡silenced¡£

The¡¡attempt¡¡to¡¡remove¡¡the¡¡President¡¡from¡¡office¡¡was¡¡the¡¡only¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡radical¡¡program¡¡that¡¡failed£»¡¡and¡¡this¡¡by¡¡the¡¡narrowest¡¡of¡¡margins¡£¡¡During¡¡the¡¡spring¡¡and¡¡summer¡¡of¡¡1866£»¡¡there¡¡was¡¡some¡¡talk¡¡among¡¡politicians¡¡of¡¡impeaching¡¡President¡¡Johnson£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡December¡¡a¡¡resolution¡¡was¡¡introduced¡¡by¡¡Representative¡¡Ashley¡¡of¡¡Ohio¡¡looking¡¡toward¡¡impeachment¡£¡¡Though¡¡the¡¡committee¡¡charged¡¡with¡¡the¡¡investigation¡¡of¡¡¡¨the¡¡official¡¡conduct¡¡of¡¡Andrew¡¡Johnson¡¨¡¡reported¡¡that¡¡enough¡¡testimony¡¡had¡¡been¡¡taken¡¡to¡¡justify¡¡further¡¡inquiry£»¡¡the¡¡House¡¡took¡¡no¡¡action¡£¡¡There¡¡were¡¡no¡¡less¡¡than¡¡five¡¡attempts¡¡at¡¡impeachment¡¡during¡¡the¡¡next¡¡year¡£¡¡Stevens£»¡¡Butler£»¡¡and¡¡others¡¡were¡¡anxious¡¡to¡¡get¡¡the¡¡President¡¡out¡¡of¡¡the¡¡way£»¡¡but¡¡the¡¡majority¡¡were¡¡as¡¡yet¡¡unwilling¡¡to¡¡impeach¡¡for¡¡merely¡¡political¡¡reasons¡£¡¡There¡¡were¡¡some¡¡who¡¡thought¡¡that¡¡the¡¡radicals¡¡had¡¡sufficient¡¡majorities¡¡to¡¡ensure¡¡all¡¡needed¡¡legislation¡¡and¡¡did¡¡not¡¡relish¡¡the¡¡thought¡¡of¡¡Ben¡¡Wade¡¡in¡¡the¡¡presidency¡£*¡¡Others¡¡considered¡¡that¡¡no¡¡just¡¡grounds¡¡for¡¡action¡¡had¡¡been¡¡found¡¡in¡¡the¡¡several¡¡investigations¡¡of¡¡Johnson's¡¡record¡£¡¡Besides£»¡¡the¡¡President's¡¡authority¡¡and¡¡influence¡¡had¡¡been¡¡much¡¡curtailed¡¡by¡¡the¡¡legislation¡¡relating¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Freedmen's¡¡Bureau£»¡¡tenure¡¡of¡¡office£»¡¡reconstruction£»¡¡and¡¡command¡¡of¡¡the¡¡army£»¡¡and¡¡Congress¡¡had¡¡also¡¡refused¡¡to¡¡recognize¡¡his¡¡amnesty¡¡and¡¡pardoning¡¡powers¡£

*¡¡Senator¡¡Wade¡¡of¡¡Ohio¡¡was¡¡President¡¡pro¡¡tempore¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Senate¡¡and¡¡by¡¡the¡¡act¡¡of¡¡1791¡¡would¡¡succeed¡¡President¡¡Johnson¡¡if¡¡he¡¡were¡¡removed¡¡from¡¡office¡£

But¡¡the¡¡desire¡¡to¡¡impeach¡¡the¡¡President¡¡was¡¡increasing¡¡in¡¡power£»¡¡and¡¡very¡¡little¡¡was¡¡needed¡¡to¡¡provoke¡¡a¡¡trial¡¡of¡¡strength¡¡between¡¡the¡¡radicals¡¡and¡¡the¡¡President¡£¡¡The¡¡drift¡¡toward¡¡impeachment¡¡was¡¡due¡¡in¡¡part¡¡to¡¡the¡¡legislative¡¡reaction¡¡against¡¡the¡¡executive£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡part¡¡to¡¡Johnson's¡¡own¡¡opposition¡¡to¡¡reconstruction¡¡and¡¡to¡¡his¡¡use¡¡of¡¡the¡¡patronage¡¡against¡¡the¡¡radicals¡£¡¡Specific¡¡grievances¡¡were¡¡found¡¡in¡¡his¡¡vetoes¡¡of¡¡the¡¡various¡¡reconstruction¡¡bills£»¡¡in¡¡his¡¡criticisms¡¡of¡¡Congress¡¡and¡¡the¡¡radical¡¡leaders£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡the¡¡fact£»¡¡as¡¡Stevens¡¡asserted£»¡¡that¡¡he¡¡was¡¡a¡¡¡¨radical¡¡renegade¡£¡¨¡¡Johnson¡¡was¡¡a¡¡Southern¡¡man£»¡¡an¡¡old¡­line¡¡State¡¡Rights¡¡Democrat£»¡¡somewhat¡¡anti¡­Negro¡¡in¡¡feeling¡£¡¡He¡¡knew¡¡no¡¡book¡¡except¡¡t

·µ»ØĿ¼ ÉÏÒ»Ò³ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨0£© ²È£¨0£©

Äã¿ÉÄÜϲ»¶µÄ