贝壳电子书 > 哲学宗教电子书 > 莱尔主教upper_room >

第7章

莱尔主教upper_room-第7章

小说: 莱尔主教upper_room 字数: 每页4000字

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!



   noonday。 Every word is the right word; and every word is in its right
   place。 Yet the labour those sermons cost Mr。 Bradley was very great
   indeed。 Those who have read Goldsmith's Vicar of Wakefield attentively;
   can hardly fail to have noticed the exquisite naturalness; ease; and
   simplicity of its language。 And yet it is known that the pains and
   trouble and time bestowed upon that work were immense。 Let the Vicar of
   Wakefield be pared with Johnson's Rasselas; which was written off in
   a few days; it is said; under higher pressure; hand the difference is
   at once apparent。 In fact; to use very long words; to seem very
   learned; to make people go away after a sermon saying; 〃How fine! how
   clever! how grand!〃 all this is very easy work。 But to write what will
   strike and stick; to speak or to write that which at once pleases and
   is understood; and bees assimilated with a heater's mind and a thing
   never forgottenthat; we may depend upon it; is a very difficult thing
   and a very rare attainment。

   (c) Let me observe; in the next place; that when I talk of simplicity
   in preaching; I would not have my readers suppose I mean childish
   preaching。 If we suppose the poor like that sort of sermon; we are
   greatly mistaken。 If our hearers once imagine we consider them a parcel
   of ignorant folks for whom any kind of 〃infant's food〃 is good enough;
   our chance of doing good is lost altogether。 People do not like even
   the appearance of condescending preaching。 They feel we are not
   treating them as equals; but inferiors。 Human nature always dislikes
   that。 They will at once put up their backs; stop their ears; and take
   offence; and then we might as well preach to the winds。

   (d) Finally; let me observe; that it is not coarse or vulgar preaching
   that is needed。 It is quite possible to be simple; and yet to speak
   like a gentleman; and with the demeanour of a courteous and refined
   person。 It is an utter mistake to imagine that uneducated and
   illiterate men and women prefer to be spoken to in an illiterate way;
   and by an uneducated person。 To suppose that a lay…evangelist or
   Scripture…reader; who knows nothing of Latin or Greek; and is only
   familiar with his Bible; is more acceptable than an Oxford first…class
   man; or a Cambridge wrangler (if that first…class man knows how to
   preach); is a plete error。 People only tolerate vulgarity and
   coarseness; as a rule; when they can get nothing else。

   Having made these prefatory remarks in order to clear the way; I will
   now proceed to give my readers five brief hints as to what seems to me
   the best method of attaining simplicity in preaching。

   I。 My first hint is this: If you want to attain simplicity in
   preaching; take care that you have a clear view of the subject upon
   which you are going to preach。 I ask your special attention to this。 Of
   all the five hints I am about to give; this is the most important。
   Mind; then; when your text is chosen; that you understand it and see
   right through it; that you know precisely what you want to prove; what
   you want to teach; what you want to establish; and what you want
   people's minds to carry away。 If you yourself begin in a fog; you may
   depend upon it you will leave your people in darkness。 Cicero; one of
   the greatest ancient orators; said long ago; 〃No one can possibly speak
   clearly and eloquently about a subject which he does not
   understand;〃…and I am satisfied that he spoke the truth。 Archbishop
   Whately was a very shrewd observer of human nature; and he said rightly
   of a vast number of preachers; that 〃they aimed at nothing; and they
   hit nothing。 Like men landing on an unknown island; and setting out on
   a journey of exploration; they set out in ignorance; and travelled on
   in ignorance all the day long。〃

   I ask all young ministers especially; to remember this first hint。 I
   repeat most emphatically; 〃Take care you thoroughly understand your
   subject。 Never choose a text of which you do not quite know what it
   means。〃 Beware of taking obscure passages such as those which are to be
   found in unfulfilled and emblematic prophecies。 If a man will
   continually preach to an ordinary congregation about the seals and
   vials and trumpets in Revelation; or about Ezekiel's temple; or about
   predestination; free will; and the eternal purposes of God; it will not
   be at all surprising to any reasonable mind if he fails to attain
   simplicity。 I do not mean that these subjects ought not to be handled
   occasionally; at fit times; and before a suitable audience。 All I say
   is; that they are very deep subjects; about which wise Christians often
   disagree; and it is almost impossible to make them very simple。 We
   ought to see our subjects plainly; if we wish to make them simple; and
   there are hundreds of plain subjects to be found in God's Word。

   Beware; for the same reason; of taking up what I call fanciful subjects
   and acmodated texts; and then dragging out of them meanings which
   the Holy Ghost never intended to put into them。 There is no subject
   needful for the soul's health which is not to be found plainly taught
   and set forth in Scripture。 This being the case; I think a preacher
   should never take a text and extract from it; as a dentist would a
   tooth from the jaw; something which; however true in itself; is not the
   plain literal meaning of the inspired words。 The sermon may seem very
   glittering and ingenious; and his people may go away saying; 〃What a
   clever parson we have got!〃 But if; on examination; they can neither
   find the sermon in the text; nor the text in the sermon; their minds
   are perplexed; and they begin to think the Bible is a deep book which
   cannot be understood。 If you want to attain simplicity; beware of
   acmodated texts。

   When I speak of acmodated texts; let me explain what I mean。 I
   remember hearing of a minister in a northern town; who was famous for
   preaching in this style。 Once he gave out for his text; 〃He that is so
   impoverished that he hath no oblation; chooseth unto him a tree that
   will not rot〃 (Isa。 40:20)。 〃Here;〃 said he; 〃is man by nature
   impoverished and undone。 He has nothing to offer; in order to make
   satisfaction for his soul。 And what ought he to do? He ought to choose
   a tree which cannot rot; even the cross of our Lord Jesus

   Christ。〃On another occasion; being anxious to preach on the doctrine
   of indwelling sin; he chose his text out of the history of Joseph and
   his brethren; and gave out the words; 〃The old man of whom ye spake; is
   he yet alive?〃 (Gen。 43:27)。 Out of this question he ingeniously
   twisted a discourse about the infection of nature remaining in the
   believer;a grand truth; no doubt; but certainly not the truth of the
   passage。 Such instances will; I trust; be a warning to all my younger
   brethren。 If you want to preach about the indwelling corruption of
   human nature; or about Christ crucified; you need not seek for such
   far…fetched texts as those I have named。 If you want to be simple; mind
   you choose plain simple texts。

   Furthermore; if you wish to see through your subjects thoroughly; and
   so to attain the foundation of simplicity; do not be ashamed of
   dividing your sermons and stating your divisions。 I need hardly say
   this is a very vexed question。 There is a morbid dread of 〃firstly;
   secondly; and thirdly〃 in many quarters。 The stream of fashion runs
   strongly against divisions; and I must frankly confess that a lively
   undivided sermon is much better than one divided in a dull; stupid;
   illogical way。 Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind。 He
   that can preach sermons which strike and stick without divisions; by
   all means let him hold on his way and persevere。 But let him not
   despise his neighbour who divides。 All I say is; if we would be simple;
   there must be order in a sermon as there is in an army。 What wise
   general would mix up artillery; infantry; and cavalry in one confused
   mass i

返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0

你可能喜欢的