贝壳电子书 > 英文原著电子书 > the antiquities of the jews-1 >

第327章

the antiquities of the jews-1-第327章

小说: the antiquities of the jews-1 字数: 每页4000字

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!



3。 sect。 3; and of God the Word; in his homily concerning Hades;
may be both genuine。 Nor is the other expression of Divine Angel;
used presently; and before; also of any other signification。

(26) Josephus here calls Ismael a young child or infant; though
he was about 13 years of age; as Judas calls himself and his
brethren young men; when he was 47; and had two children; Antiq。
B。 II。 ch。 6。 sect。 8; and they were of much the same age; as is
a damsel of 12 years old called a little child; Mark 5:39…42;
five several times。 Herod is also said by Josephus to be a very
young man at 25。 See the note on Antiq。 B。 XIV。 ch。 9。 sect 2;
and of the War; B。 I。 ch。 10。 And Aristobulus is styled a very
little child at 16 years of age; Antiq。 B。 XV。 ch。 2。 sect。 6; 7。
Domitian also is called by him a very young child; when he went
on his German expedition at about 18 years of age; of the War; B。
VII。 ch。 4。 sect。 2。 Samson's wife; and Ruth; when they were
widows; are called children; Antiq。 B。 V。 ch。 8。 sect。 6; and ch。
9。 sect。 2 3。

(27) Note; that both here and Hebrews 11:17; Isaac is called
Abraham's only begotten son; though he at the same time had
another son; Ismael。 The Septuagint expresses the true meaning;
by rendering the text the beloved son。

(28) Here is a plain error in the copies which say that king
David afterwards built the temple on this Mount Moriah; while it
was certainly no other than king Solomon who built that temple;
as indeed Procopius cites it from Josephus。 For it was for
certain David; and not Solomon; who built the first altar there;
as we learn; 2 Samuel 24:18; etc。; 1 Chronicles 21:22; etc。; and
Antiq。 B。 VII。 ch。 13。 sect。 4。

(29) It seems both here; and in God's parallel blessing to Jacob;
ch。 19。 sect。 1; that Josephus had yet no notion of the hidden
meaning of that most important and most eminent promise; 〃In thy
seed shall all the families of the earth be blessed。 He saith
not; and of seeds; as of many; but as of one; and to thy seed;
which is Christ;〃 Galatians 3:16。 Nor is it any wonder; he being;
I think; as yet not a Christian。 And had he been a Christian; yet
since he was; to be sure; till the latter part of his life; no
more than an Ebionite Christian; who; above all the apostles;
rejected and despised St。 Paul; it would be no great wonder if he
did not now follow his interpretation。 In the mean time; we have
in effect St。 Paul's exposition in the Testament of Reuben; sect。
6; in Authent。 Rec。 Part I。 p。 302; who charges his sons 〃to
worship the seed of Judah; who should die for them in visible and
invisible wars; and should be among them an eternal king。〃 Nor is
that observation of a learned foreigner of my acquaintance to be
despised; who takes notice; that as seeds in the plural; must
signify posterity; so seed in the singular may signify either
posterity; or a single person; and that in this promise of all
nations being happy in the seed of Abraham; or Isaac; or Jacob;
etc。 it is always used in the singular。 To which I shall add;
that it is sometimes; as it were; paraphrased by the son of
Abraham; the son of David; etc。; which is capable of no such
ambiguity。

(30) The birth of Jacob and Esau is here said to be after
Abraham's death: it should have been after Sarah's death。 The
order of the narration in Genesis; not always exactly according
to the order of time; seems to have led Josephus into this error;
as Dr。 Bernard observes here。

(31) For Seir in Josephus; the coherence requires that we read
Esau or Seir; which signify the same thing。

(32) The supper of savory meat; as we call it; Genesis 27:4; to
be caught by hunting; was intended plainly for a festival or a
sacrifice; and upon the prayers that were frequent at sacrifices;
Isaac expected; as was then usual in such eminent cases; that a
divine impulse would come upon him; in order to the blessing of
his son there present; and his foretelling his future behavior
and fortune。 Whence it must be; that when Isaac had unwittingly
blessed Jacob; and was afterwards made sensible of his mistake;
yet did he not attempt to alter it; how earnestly soever his
affection for Esau might incline him to wish it might be altered;
because he knew that this blessing came not from himself; but
from God; and that an alteration was out of his power。 A second
afflatus then came upon him; and enabled him to foretell Esau's
future behavior and foretell Esau's future behavior and fortune
also。

(33) Whether Jacob or his mother Rebeka were most blameable in
this imposition upon Isaac in his old age; I cannot determine。
However the blessing being delivered as a prediction of future
events; by a Divine impulse; and foretelling things to befall to
the posterity of Jacob and Esau in future ages; was for certain
providential; and according to what Rebeka knew to be the purpose
of God; when he answered her inquiry; 〃before the children were
born;〃 Genesis 25:23; 〃that one people should be stronger than
the other people; and the elder; Esau; should serve the younger;
Jacob。〃 Whether Isaac knew or remembered this old oracle;
delivered in our copies only to Rebeka; or whether; if he knew
and remembered it; he did not endeavor to alter the Divine
determination; out of his fondness for his elder and worser son
Esau; to the damage of his younger and better son Jacob; as
Josephus elsewhere supposes; Antiq。 B。 II。 ch。 7。 sect。 3; I
cannot certainly say。 if so; this might tempt Rebeka to contrive;
and Jacob to put this imposition upon him。 However; Josephus says
here; that it was Isaac; and not Rebeka; who inquired of God at
first; and received the forementioned oracle; sect。 1; which; if
it be the true reading; renders Isaac's procedure more
inexcusable。 Nor was it probably any thing else that so much
encouraged Esau formerly to marry two Canaanitish wives; without
his parents' consent; as Isaac's unhappy fondness for him。

(34) By this 〃deprivation of the kingdom that was to be given
Esau of God;〃 as the first…born; it appears that Josephus thought
that a 〃kingdom to be derived from God〃 was due to him whom Isaac
should bless as his first…born; which I take to be that kingdom
which was expected under the Messiah; who therefore was to be
born of his posterity whom Isaac should so bless。 Jacob therefore
by obtaining this blessing of the first…born; became the genuine
heir of that kingdom; in opposition to Esau。

(35) Here we have the difference between slaves for life and
servants; such as we now hire for a time agreed upon on both
sides; and dismiss again after he time contracted for is over;
which are no slaves; but free men and free women。 Accordingly;
when the Apostolical Constitutions forbid a clergyman to marry
perpetual servants or slaves; B。 VI。 ch。 17。; it is meant only of
the former sort; as we learn elsewhere from the same
Constitutions; ch。 47。 Can。 LXXXII。 But concerning these twelve
sons of Jacob; the reasons of their several names; and the times
of their several births in the intervals here assigned; their
several excellent characters; their several faults and
repentance; the several accidents of their lives; with their
several prophecies at their deaths; see the Testaments of these
twelve patriarchs; still preserved at large in the Authent。 Rec。
Part I。 p。 294…443。

(36) I formerly explained these mandrakes; as we; with the
Septuagint; and Josephus; render the Hebrew word Dudaim; of the
Syrian Maux; with Ludolphus; Antbent。 Rec。 Part I。 p。 420; but
have since seen such a very probable account in M。 S。 of my
learned friend Mr。 Samuel Barker; of what we still call
mandrakes; and their description by the ancient naturalists and
physicians; as inclines me to think these here mentioned were
really mandrakes; and no other。

(37) Perhaps this may be the proper meaning of the word Israel;
by the present and the old Jerusalem analogy of the Hebrew
tongue。 In the mean time; it is certain that the Hellenists of
the first century; in Egypt and elsewhere; interpreted Israel to
be a man seeing God; as is evident from the argument fore…cited。

(38) Of this slaughter of the Shechemites by Simeon and Levi; see
Authent。 Rec。 Part I。 p。 309; 418

返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0

你可能喜欢的