study of the king james bible(杯咫ヾ淵将ゝ冩梢)-及50嫗
梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��
the rule of the whole is frankly recognized�察 �and where each man holds
himself independent of his fellows only in the sense that he will claim the
right to hold such relation to God and his duty as he himself may
apprehend。
In these times�察 �also�察 �the development of temporal and material
prosperity with the intellectual mood which is involved in that affects the
attitude of the age toward the Bible。 Sometimes it is spoken of as a
scientific age over against the earlier philosophical ages。 Perhaps that will
do for a rough statement of the facts。 It is the age of experiment�察�of trying
things out�察�and there naturally works into men a feeling that the things that
will yield to the most material scientific experimentation are the things
about which they can be certain and which are of real value。 That naturally
involves a good deal of appreciation of the present�察 �and calls for the
improvement of the conditions of present life first of all。 It looks more
141
´ Page 142´
Study of the King James Bible
important to see that a man is well fed�察�well housed�察�well clothed�察�and well
educated than that he should have the interests of eternity pressed on his
attention。 That is a comparatively late feeling。 It issues partly from the fact
that this is a scientific age�察�when science has had its attention turned to the
needs of humanity。
Another result of our scientific age is the magnifying of the natural�察�
while the Bible frankly asserts the supernatural。 No effort to get the
supernatural out of the Bible�察�in order to make it entirely acceptable to the
man who scouts the supernatural�察 �has thus far proved successful。 Of
course�察�the supernatural can be taken out of the Bible�察�but it will destroy
the Bible。 Nor is there much gain in playing with words and insisting that
everything is supernatural or that everything is natural。 There is a
difference between the two�察 �and in an age which insists upon nature or
natural laws or forces or events as all´ sufficient it is almost inevitable that
the Bible should lose its hold�察�at least temporarily。
Regarding all this there are some things that need to be said。 For one
thing�察 �this�察 �too�察 �is a passing condition。 As a matter of fact�察 �men are not
creatures of time。 They actually have eternal connections�察 �and the great
outstanding facts which have always made eternity of importance continue。
The fact is that men continue to die�察�and that the men who are left behind
cannot avoid the sense of mystery and awe which is involved in that fact。
The fact also is that the human emotions cannot be explained on the lower
basis�察�and the only reason men think they can be is because they have in
the back of their minds the old explanations which they cast into the lower
forms�察�deceiving themselves into thinking they are new ideas when they
are not。
It ought to be added that the Bible has greatly suffered in all its history
at the hands of men who have believed in it and have fought in its behalf。
Many of the controversies which were hottest were needless and injurious。
All the folly has not been on one side。 Some one referred the other day to
a list of more than a hundred scientific theories which were proposed at
the beginning of the last century and abandoned at the end of it。 Scientific
men are feeling their way�察�many of them reverently and devoutly�察�some of
them rather blatantly and with a readiness for publication�察�which hastens
142
´ Page 143´
Study of the King James Bible
them into notoriety。 But there has been enough folly on both sides to make
every one go cautiously。 It has been remarked that in Dr。 Draper's book
The Conflict Between Science and Religion he makes science appear as a
strong´ limbed angel of God whereas religion is always a great ass。 The
title of the book itself is not fair。 In no proper understanding of the words
can there be any conflict between science and religion。 There can be a
conflict�察 �as Dr。 Andrew D。 White puts it�察 �between science and theology。
There can certainly be contest between scientists and religionists。 Science
and religion have no conflict。
It is interesting to observe how far back most of the supposed conflicts
actually lie。 There is no warfare now�察�and�察�while our fathers one or two
generations ago felt that they must fly to the defense of religion against the
attacks of science�察 �no man wastes his strength doing that to´day。 That
period has passed。 The trouble is that some good people do not know it�察�
and are just fond enough of a bit of a tussle to keep up the fighting in the
mountain´passes while out in the plain the main armies have laid down
their arms and are busy tilling the soil。
The period of conflict is past�察 �partly because we are learning to
distinguish between the Bible as it really is and certain long´established
ideas about the Bible which came from other sources and have become
attached to it until it seemed to sustain them。 The proper doctrine of
evolution is entirely compatible with the Bible。 The great Dr。 Hodge
declared that the consistent Darwinian must be an atheist。 For that matter�察�
Shelley defended himself by saying that�察 �of course�察 �the consistent
Newtonian must necessarily be an atheist。; But fifty years have made
great changes in the doctrine of evolution�察�and the old scare has been over
for some time。 Newton is honored in the church quite as much as in the
university�察�and Darwin is not a name to frighten anybody。 Understanding
evolution better and knowing the Bible better�察�the two do not jangle out of
tune so badly but that harmony is promised。
The doctrine of the antiquity of the world is entirely compatible with
the Bible�察 �though it is not compatible with the dates which Archbishop
Ussher�察�in the time of King James�察�put at the head of the columns。 That is
so with other scientific theories。 Any one who has read much of history
143
´ Page 144´
Study of the King James Bible
has attended the obsequies of so many theories in the realm of science that
he ought to know that he is wasting his strength in trying to bring about a
constant reconciliation between scientific and religious theories。 It is his
part to keep an open mind in assurance of the unity of truth�察�an assurance
that there is no fact which can possibly come to light and no true theory of
facts which can possibly be formed which does not serve the interest of
the truth�察�which the Bible also presents。 The Bible does not concern itself
with all departments of knowledge。 So far as mistakes have been made on
the side of those who believe it�察�they have issued from forgetting that fact
more than from any other one cause。
On the other hand�察 �it has sometimes occurred that believers in the
Bible have been quite too eager to accommodate themselves to purely
passing phases of objection to it。 The matter mentioned a moment ago�察�the
excision of the supernatural�察�is a case in point。 The easy and glib way in
which some have sought to get